Friday, October 29, 2004

WORKING THE NEWS CYCLE

Today's Pentagon briefing, which attempted to explain the missing al Qaqaa explosives, seems to me to have been worse than saying nothing.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- An Army unit removed 250 tons of ammunition from the Al-Qaqaa weapons depot in April 2003 and later destroyed it, the company's former commander said Friday. A Pentagon spokesman said some was of the same type as the missing explosives that have become a major issue in the presidential campaign.

But those 250 tons were not located under the seal of the International Atomic Energy Agency -- as the missing high-grade explosives had been -- and Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita could not definitely say whether they were part of the missing 377 tons.

Maj. Austin Pearson, speaking at a press conference at the Pentagon, said his team removed 250 tons of TNT, plastic explosives, detonation cords, and white phosporous rounds on April 13, 2003 -- 10 days after U.S. forces first reached the Al Qaqaa site.

``I did not see any IAEA seals at any of the locations we went into. I was not looking for that,'' Pearson said.

Di Rita sought to point to Pearson's comments as evidence that some RDX, one of the high-energy explosives, might have been removed from the site. RDX is also known as plastic explosive.

But Di Rita acknowledged: ``I can't say RDX that was on the list of IAEA is what the major pulled out. ... We believe that some of the things they were pulling out of there were RDX.''

Further study was needed, Di Rita said.


No shit?

It probably would've been easier and a lot less time-consuming if Di Rita had just lit off a smoke bomb from the podium, yelled "YOINK!" and then run away.

You know guys, in the future, it might be good to give someone a clipboard and pencil and have him/her keep track of exactly which and how much ammunition you're destroying. That way, when questions come up...

Just trying to light a candle.

No comments: